Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed
Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed
Blog Article
Your session is about to timeout as a result of inactivity. Simply click Alright to extend your time for a further 0 minutes.
I've made use of H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There are not numerous cartridges which i utilize it for as I seem usually to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can not state that it won't perform. It is just that A few other powders perform improved for the specified cartridge. For instance, during the 280, H4831 gave me very good velocity and very wonderful teams with Nosler 140 AB. Nevertheless, RL19 was marginally superior in precision, even though the velocity was just about identical.
The most obvious cause is usually a tough/ruff bore. No quantity of copper fouling lessening brokers inside the powder will probably right this.
Run your load up with the specific powder (sc or regular) and large amount you will be employing nevertheless. Identical burn charge doesn't mean it can behave "just" the identical. I have witnessed about one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
some cartridges tend copper foul greater than Some others however, despite how easy the complete is on the bore and involve cleansing in the copper fouling more normally.
Did you at any time consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with typical chamber. Wanting to know What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Any person loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcomes, any data it is possible to share? Also needs to point out I have some ELD-X 175's I want to examination out, When you've got info on that at the same time.
Like said previously mentioned, very same things. All of that is different is the size of the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they are going to only make the SC in the future. h4831sc load data I have no idea if that is true or not but would seem sensible to me. I take advantage of SC due to the fact which is what I found in the eight lb jug and it works.
Presently making use of IMR 4831 in the 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular option for h4831sc this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. In addition to it getting quick Lower, what exactly is the main difference in these two powders, and may I change to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? Just what is my stage? I am unsure that there is a serious valid stage apart from what on earth is popular with most hasn't been well-liked with me at all in these instances. Do I just have a powder jinx or a thing? In order to explain to you how outrageous I really am, tomorrow I'm assortment tests a close friends new .
As for your 4831 vs 4831SC, These are the same/identical powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
It is really very likely that no further more dialogue is necessary, during which case we recommend starting a completely new thread. If having said that you are feeling your response is required you could continue to accomplish that.
Many of the previous Lyman data just outlined IMR 4831, which was surplus military services powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
The container didn't contain the "Extraordinary" symbol on it. A coworker And that i then swapped some powder, and I wound up with A further pound of H4831SC, this a person Along with the h4831sc load data "Serious" brand on it.